In the United States, few topics are argued with such passion on both sides as abortion. That’s why it’s interesting to come across a different approach to the topic: one that’s based on humanism, not religion, and reason rather than emotion.

In the blog “Stumbling and Mumbling,” Chris Dillow describes the doubts that assail anyone who regards human beings as valuable, from whatever standpoint they reach that decision (“My Abortion Doubts”). Here’s the conclusion reached:

Now, I don’t want to reach a strong conclusion here. Instinctively, I’d much rather side with abortion rights’ campaigners than with religious maniacs and evidence-manipulators. It’s just that I can’t trust my instincts.

Take a look at the comments, too. There is some good sense and careful thinking there as well. Two other sites are also referenced for more on this discussion: an article in The Times (London) titled “Embryos have souls? What nonsense” and “Abortion: Rational Discussion/Debate” on the blog “Swords Crossed.”

As one of those who commented on “Stumbling and Mumbling” wrote:

We SHOULD look at abortion from many angles. We SHOULD question whether it’s right or wrong. Even those of us who know we’re better off with it legal should examine the reasoning behind it.

Hear! Hear!

Technorati Tags: abortion debate, right to choose, humanism, skepticism, rational debate